Thanks FBers
Tuesday, February 23, 2021
10 comments:
Put it here ... I can't wait to read it. I have the Captcha turned OFF but blogger insists it be there. You should be able to bypass it.
** Anonymous, please use a name at the end of your comment. You're all starting to look alike.
*** Moderation has been added due to Spam and a Commenter a little too caustic. I welcome comments, but talk of killing and racist (or even close to racist) are not welcome.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Pelosi. The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world she didn't exist
ReplyDeletePete, his right hand gal.
DeleteI expect we'll get the answer to the second to last question in a couple more months.
ReplyDeleteedutcher, it can get worse, huh.
DeleteLet me digress for a moment... "White Supremist" when did this first come about? History lesson... in the 1600's, "supremist" was someone who assumes supreme authority. While the Oxford English Dictionary says this term is obsolete, the basis stayed the same. In fact it was on April 5, 1896 "supremist" appeared in the Daily Picayune in New Orleans:
ReplyDelete"The combine are determined to register the negroes, and the white supremacists are equally determined that they shall not."
The next day, April 6, 1896 the earliest racist citation for "supremist" was published in the Daily Inter Ocean, Chicago newspaper:
"The white supremists, or regular Democrats, say that the negroes shall not register".
Whether you say "supremacist or supremist, both derive from the Latin word, supremus, classical Latin for; "highest in position, topmost, culminating"...
So my take? There are no "White Supremist" there is only Congressional Supremist!
Unknown, Thanks for the history lesson and observation, as with congress.
DeleteUnknown nailed it.
ReplyDeleteHave a fabulous day, Odie. ♥
Sandee, good for Unknown, huh.
DeleteGood ones again. God bless!
ReplyDeleteThank You LindaG!
Delete