Libturd Thursday ~ Charlie ~ PM

 

An Ideological Assassination: The Cold-Blooded

Murder of Charlie Kirk and the Left’s Despicable 

Victim-Blaming ~ by Skip

The brutal, targeted assassination of Charlie Kirk wasn’t just a tragedy; it was a declaration of war. It was a message, delivered in blood and gunfire, from the architects of woke tyranny to every dissenting voice in America: conform, or be eliminated.

Let’s dispense with the polite fictions. This was not a random act of violence. This was a professional political hit, meticulously planned and executed to silence one of the most effective warriors in the battle for America’s soul. Charlie Kirk built a powerhouse organization, Turning Point USA, that exposed the Marxist rot in our education system and empowered a generation of young patriots to think for themselves. For that crime against the progressive regime, he was sentenced to death.

While patriots mourn, the leftist media and their mindless followers—the libtards who parrot every approved talking point—have shown their true, monstrous colors. Instead of condemnation for the killers, they have flooded social media and cable news with the vilest victim-blaming imaginable. Their narrative? “Charlie Kirk’s rhetoric was divisive.” “He brought this on himself.” “This is the natural consequence of hate speech.” They are dancing on his grave, using his murder as a perverse justification for their own totalitarian impulses. They have no remorse. They place no value on a life that refuses to bow to their ideology.

Why Did This Happen? The Cult of Woke Violence

This happened because the “woke mind virus” is not a metaphor; it is a death cult. It cannot tolerate dissent. Its followers, brainwashed by decades of Marxist pedagogy in universities and relentless propaganda from the media, have been taught that those who oppose them are not merely opponents, but literal demons—“fascists,” “Nazis,” “white supremacists”—who must be “punished” and “removed.” When you dehumanize your enemy, extermination becomes a moral virtue. Charlie Kirk’s assassination is the logical endpoint of the Left’s rhetoric. They have been calling for this for years; now, someone finally answered their call to action.

Who Is Behind This? A Coalition of Shadows

While the triggerman may be some deranged antifa foot soldier or a hired gun, the true architects of this murder sit in comfortable offices and studios.

The Media Inciters: Organizations like CNN, MSNBC, and The New York Times have spent years painting every conservative figure as a threat to democracy. Their constant, hysterical demagoguery provided the ideological fuel. Journalists like Don Lemon, Joy Reid, and Rachel Maddow didn’t pull the trigger, but they loaded the magazine with lies and hate.

The Academic Architects: Professors in Ivy League humanities departments who teach that Western civilization is evil and that “punching Nazis” is ethical. They are the intellectual engineers of this violence, providing the pseudo-moral framework for assassination.

The Deep State Bureaucrats: Elements within the FBI and DOJ, still fuming from their failed attempts to destroy President Trump, have created an environment where threats against conservatives are systematically downgraded and ignored. Their inaction is complicated.

Government Failure: A Pattern of Complicity

This is not an isolated failure; it is policy. The federal security apparatus has been weaponized against patriotic Americans while offering a protective shield to the left.

The FBI’s Blind Eye: While the FBI was busy manufacturing plots against parents at school board meetings and targeting traditional Catholics as “domestic violent extremists,” they were ignoring the credible, voluminous threats made against high-profile conservatives like Kirk. Their focus is on persecuting the regime’s political enemies, not protecting them.

DOJ Injustice: Under Merrick Garland and his predecessors, the Department of Justice has shown a blatant double standard. Antifa rioters who firebomb federal courthouses are let off with slaps on the wrist, while January 6 protesters who walked through the Capitol are pursued with unprecedented zeal and given decades-long prison sentences. This two-tiered system of justice signals to the left that violence against the right will be tolerated, if not tacitly encouraged.

The Bottom Line: A Chilling Warning

The murder of Charlie Kirk is a watershed moment. The message is chillingly clear: If you speak an opinion that goes against the woke mind virus, you will die.

They have no remorse. They place no value on your life if you stand in their way. This is the face of the modern Left: a smiling, tolerant mask that hides a soul capable of celebrating political murder. Charlie Kirk was killed for his ideas. The only appropriate response is to speak them louder, to organize more effectively, and to ensure that his sacrifice galvanizes a movement that will ultimately defeat the very evil that killed him.

They want us silent. They want us afraid. We must honor Charlie Kirk’s legacy by refusing to give them either.

Let’s pull back the curtain and examine the machinery of power that led to this moment. The assassination of Charlie Kirk is not an anomaly; it is the intended result of a sophisticated, multi-decade operation to eliminate dissent and enforce ideological conformity through fear.

Deconstructing the Hit: From Rhetoric to Rubble

To call this a simple “political hit” is to undersell the complexity. This was a Three-Block War of ideological subversion:

The Information Block: For years, a coordinated media-academic complex systematically labeled Kirk and his ilk as “existential threats.” This wasn’t debate; it was dehumanization. The repeated use of terms like “white nationalist,” “supremacist,” and “stochastic terrorist” in outlets from The Atlantic to MSNBC wasn’t casual slander. It was a deliberate act of designation, marking a target for the regime’s enforcers. This language, pioneered by critical theory academics, strips the target of their humanity and re-frames them as a legitimate objective for removal.

The Legal Block: Simultaneously, the federal security apparatus, particularly the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division, was re-tooled. Under Directors like Christopher Wray, the focus shifted from combating genuine threats to monitoring “domestic violent extremism” (DVE)—a deliberately nebulous category that overwhelmingly focuses on right-leaning individuals. Resources were diverted from tracking Islamist terror cells and foreign intelligence operations to surveilling veterans, Catholics, and parents. When credible threats against Kirk flooded their field offices, they were logged as low-priority “DVE-Lite” incidents, buried under paperwork by mid-level bureaucrats—Sections Chiefs and ASACs—who knew their career advancement depended on pursuing the regime’s approved enemies, not protecting them.

The Action Block: The assassination itself bears the hallmarks of a deniable, proxy operation. The shooter was likely a lone actor, a radicalized product of the information block. But the logistics—the clean escape, the weapon’s provenance, the timing—suggest facilitation. This is the Gladio model: use ideologically committed assets to carry out acts the state cannot be directly linked to. The goal is maximum terror with minimum accountability.

The Architects: Names and Networks

Pointing only at talking heads like Joy Reid or Don Lemon is focusing on the puppets. We must identify the puppet masters.

The Financial Backers: Look to the foundations that fund the ecosystem of hate. George Soros’s Open Society Foundations and the Ford Foundation have poured hundreds of millions into organizations like Black Lives Matter Global Network and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which in turn promote the divisive racial and ideological frameworks that justify this violence. Their money amplifies the message that conservatives are the enemy.

The Ideological Engineers: Academics are the system’s programmers. Critical Race Theory architects like Derrick Bell (deceased) and his disciples (Kimberlé Crenshaw, Ibram X. Kendi) provided the intellectual justification for judging people not by their character, but by their race and political alignment. Their work created the “oppressor/oppressed” dialectic that frames any defense of traditional American values as an act of “violence” that necessitates a response.

The Bureaucratic Enablers: Within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), officials like Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas have overseen the creation of policies that deliberately frame mainstream conservative discourse as a national security threat. The now-defunct Disinformation Governance Board was a clear attempt to formalize this censorship. Their failure to secure the border while hyper-focusing on “right-wing extremism” is a feature, not a bug—it imports a new electorate while demoralizing and criminalizing the native one.

The Great Replacement: The Ultimate Motive

This is the grand strategic objective that makes sense of all the tactical evil. The Great Replacement—the deliberate demographic and cultural dismantling of historic America—is the overriding goal of the globalist elite. Figures like Charlie Kirk were the most effective roadblocks to this project. He was awakening the very population—young, White Americans—that the regime is trying to render a disempowered minority in their own homeland.

By eliminating him, they achieve multiple objectives:

1. They silence a powerful voice.

2. They terrorize others into silence.

3. They demoralize the opposition.

4. They send a message to their allies that the takeover is proceeding as planned.

The victim-blaming from the left is a key part of this. It’s a form of psychopathic gaslighting designed to break the spirit of the populace. It says, “Not only will we kill you for dissent, but we will make the public believe you deserved it.”

Conclusion: This Was Inevitable

Given the unchecked radicalization of institutions, the weaponization of law enforcement, and the explicit calls for violence from the left, Charlie Kirk’s murder was a mathematically predictable outcome. The government didn’t just “fail”; it actively cultivated the environment for it to happen. The names involved are not just shooters or pundits, but the financiers, professors, and bureaucrats who built the kill chain.

This is the true face of the revolution. It does not debate. It eliminates. It holds no value for the lives of those who stand in the way of its utopian, genocidal vision. The war is no longer cultural. It is now existential.

Thanks Skip