Thanks FBers
Friday, July 11, 2025
7 comments:
Put it here ... I can't wait to read it. I have the Captcha turned OFF but blogger insists it be there. You should be able to bypass it.
** Anonymous, please use a name at the end of your comment. You're all starting to look alike.
*** Moderation has been added due to Spam and a Commenter a little too caustic. I welcome comments, but talk of killing and racist (or even close to racist) are not welcome.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
GGGGGG-Grandma's family got started young.
ReplyDeleteThink it's supposed to be 27, not 37.
Delete#8 expresses a nice sentiment of multiple generations posing for a family photo. Six people won't give you seven generations, but only six at most, and if it is six, one of those mothers gave birth at the age of twelve. Otherwise, a nice sentiment.
ReplyDeleteon the generations photo - 2 things..... there are only 6 people there, so how can it be 7 generations? also, there is not a full generation of time between the 37 year old and the 49 year old. a generation is considered a minimum of 20 years. 12 years difference is not a generation.
ReplyDeleteI think the 37 was mislabelled and should have been 27 and the boy is 5
DeleteI’m thinking 6 generations unless the 49 had the 37 at 12 years old. If the 73 had both the 49 & the 37 they’re not a separate generation. if 73 & 49 are a couple, good on him, but then 49 is not part of the generational lineage.
ReplyDeleteThe 37 is likely supposed to be 27. Then it all fits.
ReplyDelete