Saturday, February 28, 2015

Google ~OR~ Rule 5 Woodsterman Style


So .... I get this left in my Blogger Dashboard:

And it leads me here:

Well, Google heard John Q Public's reaction and decided to
back down. You see three quarters of their bloggers were
mentioning the word "Wordpress" and it made them nervous.

DUH .....

Google, have some cleavage on Old Woodsterman:







Other Cleavage loving Rule 5 ers:
 
Posted by at

18 comments:

  1. GOODSTUFFFebruary 28, 2015 at 4:44 AM

    the scare has been turn off...

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownFebruary 28, 2015 at 6:21 AM

    The ruling powers at Blogger can all go suck obammy's cock!!! Long live "Rule 5"...!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Woodsterman (Odie)February 28, 2015 at 2:03 PM

      Jon, I hate it when you come here and sugar coat it.

      Delete
  3. LLFebruary 28, 2015 at 7:26 AM

    I have always found this blog's discussions of

    *The human condition,
    *The struggle of the oppressed masses against depredations of big government,
    *The need for young women have for recognition of their talent in a place where the glass ceiling keeps them down, etc.

    to be a shining pillar of education and illumination in a dark and oppressive world.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Woodsterman (Odie)February 28, 2015 at 2:04 PM

      LL, sounds like you understand this blog completely.

      Delete
  4. SandeeFebruary 28, 2015 at 8:36 AM

    I don't think your posts are the ones that they are worried about. Some blogger blogs are downright nasty.

    Have a fabulous day Odie. ☺

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Woodsterman (Odie)February 28, 2015 at 2:06 PM

      Sandee, I've always tried to not push the envelope, but lately I've had a few moments where I've slipped.

      Delete
  5. USA_AdmiralFebruary 28, 2015 at 11:33 AM

    Google is about to lose some of their edge.

    Good stuff on Saturday!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Woodsterman (Odie)February 28, 2015 at 2:08 PM

      Admiral, they befriended the Boy King and now they have to live with it.

      Delete
  6. edutcherFebruary 28, 2015 at 12:40 PM

    Odie, all you do here is offer people some good, innocent (mostly) fun and the occasionally well-deserved and often long overdue righteous indignation.

    If you have to go elsewhere, rest assured we will all follow you.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mike aka ProofFebruary 28, 2015 at 2:24 PM

    Odie, I think they had raunchier targets than you in mind. I try to keep my place PG-13, but you know what they say about the "eye of the beholder".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Woodsterman (Odie)February 28, 2015 at 8:40 PM

      Proof, you cut me to the quick ... I thought I was raunchy.

      Delete
  8. Diogenes Sarcastica™ February 28, 2015 at 7:55 PM

    ...and I think the fact Google would have to flush all the nudity from Google Images as not to be hypocritical had something to do with it. That and most of the Google staff wouldn't have porn images to look at at work.....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Woodsterman (Odie)February 28, 2015 at 8:42 PM

      DS, that was my first thought too. Where the hell do they think I get this stuff.

      Delete
  9. Ron RussellMarch 2, 2015 at 9:04 PM

    Were they trying to take away the last refuge for straight dirty old men----knowing we all are conservatives.

    ReplyDelete

Put it here ... I can't wait to read it. I have the Captcha turned OFF but blogger insists it be there. You should be able to bypass it.

** Anonymous, please use a name at the end of your comment. You're all starting to look alike.

*** Moderation has been added due to Spam and a Commenter a little too caustic. I welcome comments, but talk of killing and racist (or even close to racist) are not welcome.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)