Friday, April 24, 2026
19 comments:
Put it here ... I can't wait to read it. I have the Captcha turned OFF but blogger insists it be there. You should be able to bypass it.
** Anonymous, please use a name at the end of your comment. You're all starting to look alike.
*** Moderation has been added due to Spam and a Commenter a little too caustic. I welcome comments, but talk of killing and racist (or even close to racist) are not welcome.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I do on the tats
ReplyDeleteAnon, one for NO.
DeleteNo ink...much better.
ReplyDeleteBluesman
Bluesman, Two for NO.
DeleteTattoos, bleh! The religion of self-mutilation keeps spreading like a STD.
ReplyDeletewv citybilly, Three for NO.
DeleteTattoos, blue or pink hair, forty piercings, nose rings, all yuck.
ReplyDeletePaul V, four for NO.
DeleteI'd hazzard a guess and say probably most men apart from the man bun brigade
ReplyDeleteAnon, I'm taking that as a NO. That makes five for NO.
DeleteIt wasn't just the way the women looked back in the 50s and 60s, it was also the way they carried themselves. The vast majority were slim, stylish and took care of themselves. The first women i ever saw who were either obese or had tats were in carnival side shows
ReplyDeleteWow, that’s true. It was the side show freaks.
Deleteeclectickelvin, I'll say that makes six for NO.
DeleteMuch better without the idiot stickers
ReplyDeleteAnon, That makes seven for NO.
DeleteHi Beau, hi Sean, first is the damned 60s everybody claims to love, love the last.
ReplyDeleteedutcher, Hey, we were on a roll. The last? I'm in love with her, tat or no.
DeleteIIRC, George Harrison pitched in a fair bit of coin to the Monty Python projects as well as the other rockers.
ReplyDeleteRob Muir, they used his music too..
Delete